7 Comments
User's avatar
Kris's avatar

I dislike bash more and more - she came off as incredibly nervous and unappealing. I’m a sense , that’s a win for Harris and walz.

I don’t for the life of me understand WHY oh WHY oh WHY they do not commit to an interview on MSNBC with ODonnell ???? That would be amazing - someone who could actually ask incredibly astute ?s and they can respond with their intelligent answers . Cont to commit to CNN Bash-like interviews - we all just get more of the same . Pick and choose who you’re going to be interviewed by- bc the holt one with Biden and this are just drivel . How about Ebony? Essence? Rolling stone ? Foreign policy journals - agriculture journals - I would waste my brain cells or my time on one more interview like this . Do interviews - pick and choose who warrants your time .

Expand full comment
Tim Prentiss's avatar

Appearing on MSNBC would be preaching to the choir. She doesn't need to reach them. How about appearing on Fox? And bring receipts!

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Behnke's avatar

Yes, she was unappealing, because she never cracked a smile, in her effort to seem like a serious grownup.

Expand full comment
‘King Donald's avatar

Is @cnn really a news organization?

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Behnke's avatar

Yep. You summed it up. Dana Bash has been unserious in my book since the Biden/Trump debate, and this just confirmed that she is a below average journalist. The faux tough journalist is just a mouthpiece for her billionaire bosses’ talking points made into questions. 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄 Luckily, I haven’t watched CNN since they put on the hour long Trumpfest with no fact checking at all, in fact, totally UNCHECKED. Not serious, not defenders of democracy. Money making people. They should issue a disclaimer to that effect: “we don’t care about truth and integrity, we love money, so we want clickbait!”

Expand full comment
Kris's avatar

Wouldn’t not would 😉

Expand full comment
Al Bellenchia's avatar

They were perfect. They got better game than these questioners. (Can’t call them journalists)

Expand full comment