Thinker at the Gates

Thinker at the Gates

Share this post

Thinker at the Gates
Thinker at the Gates
Why Shouldn't There be 50 Different Disqualification Rules?

Why Shouldn't There be 50 Different Disqualification Rules?

We leave many issues up to the states, including ballot access.

Thinker at the Gates's avatar
Thinker at the Gates
Jan 07, 2024
∙ Paid
1

Share this post

Thinker at the Gates
Thinker at the Gates
Why Shouldn't There be 50 Different Disqualification Rules?
3
3
Share

One common refrain seen when reading analyses of the current debate regarding the Disqualification Clause of the 14th Amendment is that surely the Supreme Court will make a sweeping rule regarding some aspect of it (definition of insurrection, due process of enforcement, etc.) to spare us from having a patchwork of 50 different rules, one for each state…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Thinker at the Gates to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Jeremy Novak
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share